QMBLthe quantum many-body leaderboard

All instances / Spinless t-V

Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 1, n = 0.3125

Exact energy and best values (rules §6)

exact -0.6400407 ED
Wu et al. (2024) · the instance is solved
best variational -0.6400407 DMRG
Wu et al. (2024) · the lowest unflagged variational energy, a strict variational bound

Energies as E/site. Classes are different claims and are not ranked against each other.

The Hamiltonian

H = −t ∑⟨ij⟩ (c†icj + h.c.) + V ∑⟨ij⟩ ninj

Spinless fermions, t = 1, V = 1, 5 particles on 16 sites.

lattice
square
sites
16
boundary
periodic
Nf
5
V
1
energies
7

Stored as a total energy; quoted here as E/site, which is what the papers report (how the conversion works).

Every published energy

Grouped by what the number is. The exact energy comes first where there is one; in every other group the lowest unflagged energy is its best value, and each row's distance is to that best (rules §6).

Numerically exact (1)

Exact diagonalization, an exact solution, or sign-problem-free QMC where that is established. An exact energy is shown first, before the best of each other class. QMC is exact only within its error bar, which it must state, and reads exact (stochastic); an exact diagonalization outranks it. For a diagonalization resolved by symmetry sector only the ground state's sector is listed; the lowest energies of the other sectors are the instance's spectrum, in its JSON, and are not shown as the exact energy.

E/sitedistance to class bestσVar(E)V-score methodsourcecodeyearcomment
-0.6400407exact 0 n/a n/a n/a ED
VarBench reference run
Wu et al. (2024) run script 2024

Strict variational upper bounds (6)

Energies that a variational state reached (VMC, DMRG and MPS at finite bond dimension, PEPS, NQS, VQE). Each is an upper bound on the ground-state energy.

E/sitedistance to class bestσVar(E)V-score methodsourcecodeyearcomment
-0.6400407best variational 0 n/a 5.68e-14 1.7e-15 DMRG
VarBench reference run
Wu et al. (2024) run script 2024
-0.640039tied with best variational at 2σ 1.8e-6 2.8e-6 9.01e-4 2.7e-5 VMC (SJB + RBM) Wu et al. (2024) run script 2024
-0.639998 4.3e-5 8.8e-6 7.35e-3 2.2e-4 VMC (SJ + RBM) Wu et al. (2024) run script 2024
-0.639964 7.6e-5 9.5e-6 1.02e-2 3.0e-4 VMC (SJ + RBM) Wu et al. (2024) run script 2024
-0.63987 1.7e-4 6.3e-5 n/a n/a VMC (arSJVMC)
peer reviewed
Humeniuk et al. (2022) shifushuimenu/autoregressive_Slater-Jastrow 2022
-0.625 1.5e-2 n/a n/a n/a HF
peer reviewed
Humeniuk et al. (2022) 2022

How these numbers were read

Where each number below was read, and how it was checked.

-0.6400407, ED

Checked 2026-09-29 · QMBL ED cost run checks/cost/ed/results/tV--square_16_P_5_1.json (checks/cost/ed/run_ed.py: NetKet 3.22.4 operator, sparse CSR built in blocks, SciPy eigsh/ARPACK k=1 SA; commit 716e043); results file read locally, no rerun

Reported as. energy -10.240650492312088 (stored_exact -10.240650492312078, relative_difference 1.04e-15, reproduces_stored true)

|reproduced - stored| = 1.07e-14 (relative 1.04e-15); within 1e-9 relative. Sector N = 5, dimension 4368, 61 Lanczos steps (the file states no residual). The stored value is the source's own ED (varbench@2024-10-22), so two codes agree; a third code, E1's node Lanczos (qmbl-runs/qmbl-verify/out/E1-exact-recompute/results/tV__square_16_P_5_1.json), gives -10.2406504923121 (1.07e-14 from the cost run). Also read by VB4-tfising-tv#38 (scope config: ed_netket.sh: python3 ed.py --ham tv --boundary peri --ham_dim 2 --L 4 --V 1 --Nf 5; ed.py lines 7-10; ham.py lines 49-63; arXiv:2210.05871v4 p. 32 Table 2, row 'Lanczos ED (QuSpin)').

-0.6400407, DMRG

Checked 2026-09-29 · varbench/methods ed31bb0 scripts/tV/square_16_P_5_1/dmrg.sh -> programs/dmrg_itensors/tv_2d.jl, common.jl (ITensors.jl, Manifest pinned)

Reported as. VarBench tV/square_16_P_5_1.md: Energy -10.240650492312072 | Sigma (empty) | Energy Variance 5.684341886080802e-14 | DOF 5 | Einf 2.666666666666667 | Method "DMRG (maxbonddim = 74)"

Script builds the instance (4x4 torus, fermionic PBC through ITensors' Jordan-Wigner handling of 'Fermion' OpSums, Nf = 5 fixed by the QN-conserving MPS, V = 1, V n_i n_j without shift; einf and dof correct). Variational energy of the last sweep at the stated bond dimension, no extrapolation; no output log (config). Provenance: 96a2b26 (2023-02-02); 74 = sum_n min(C(8,n), C(8,5-n)), the exact MPS bond dimension at the central cut. 6e-15 above the ED -10.240650492312078 (exact MPS). Record row. M6 flag (V-score 1.7e-15) settled: exact representation, not an error.

-0.63987(6), VMC (arSJVMC)

Checked 2026-09-15 · source text of arXiv:2210.05871 read locally (arXiv HTML or pypdf layout text); value copied from the harvested cell and the text, no LLM transcription of numbers; single reading

Reported as. -10.238(1)

Table 2, V/t=1 column, arSJVMC row | Same instance.

-0.625, HF

Checked 2026-09-15 · source text of arXiv:2210.05871 read locally (arXiv HTML or pypdf layout text); value copied from the harvested cell and the text, no LLM transcription of numbers; single reading

Reported as. -10.000000

Table 2, V/t=1 column, HF row | Same as convention note above.

Coverage

Newest published number here: 2024. Literature last checked 2026-09-15 (table harvest of cached arXiv sources (match_tables.mjs --all), every matched paper read for this instance): 1 paper read, 0 of them with an energy on this page.

This instance as data

JSON · source file on GitHub · add a result · open an issue about this instance