QMBL is a record book of the state of the art in quantum many-body simulation: one row
per published energy, ranked within each Hamiltonian instance, every row citing the paper that
produced the number and declaring what kind of quantity it is. Where an instance is solved, the
exact energy is the record; everywhere else the best variational bound is.
All 341 instances and their 1215 energies →
Heisenberg chain, 20 sites, open
RNN
-0.4341229(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg chain, 20 sites, open
DMRG (max truncation error ~ 1.0E-12)
-0.4341237 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg chain, 20 sites, open
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.434089(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg chain, 20 sites, open
Jastrow baseline
-0.433638(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg chain, 20 sites
RNN
-0.44521861(9) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg chain, 20 sites
RNN + translational symmetry
-0.44521887(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg chain, 20 sites
VMC with projected fermions + Jastrow
-0.445182(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg chain, 20 sites
DMRG (max truncation error ~ 1.0E-13)
-0.4452193 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg chain, 20 sites
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.445049(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg chain, 20 sites
Jastrow baseline
-0.444397(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg kagome 2x3 (18 sites)
VQE (SR + symm. + 108 variational pars)
-0.4467304 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg kagome 2x3 (18 sites)
DMRG (bond dimension = 368)
-0.4471262 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg kagome 2x3 (18 sites)
Jastrow baseline
-0.40432(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg kagome 2x3 (18 sites)
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.43767(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg kagome 4x4 (48 sites)
VMC with Dirac spin liquid + Jastrow
-0.43043(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg kagome 4x4 (48 sites)
GCNN (6 layers, 6 feature maps), symmetric ansatz
-0.4375(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Đurić et al. (2024)
Heisenberg kagome 4x4 (48 sites)
DMRG, truncation-error extrapolated (Torus 4)
-0.4383(2) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Depenbrock et al. (2012)
Heisenberg kagome 8x8 (192 sites)
VMC with Dirac spin liquid + Jastrow
-0.42987(1) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg kagome 8x8 (192 sites)
VMC, Gutzwiller-projected U(1) Dirac spin liquid (NN hopping, [0,pi] flux, no Jastrow)...
-0.42724(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
He et al. (2024)
Heisenberg kagome 8x8 (192 sites)
VMC, Gutzwiller-projected U(1) Dirac spin liquid (NN hopping, [0,pi] flux, no Jastrow)...
-0.42868(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
He et al. (2024)
Heisenberg kagome 8x8 (192 sites)
VMC, Gutzwiller-projected U(1) Dirac spin liquid SL-[0,pi], mixed spinon boundary...
-0.42866(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Ran et al. (2007)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 2x2x2 (128 sites)
mVMC (PP + RBM + 1st step Lanczos, spin-parity projection, Number of RBM neurons: 128)
-0.49220(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 2x2x2 (128 sites)
SU(2) DMRG, extrapolated (χ→∞, linear fit vs two-site variance), snake path
-0.493(1) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Hagymási et al. (2020)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 2x2x2 (128 sites)
spin-parity mVMC-RBM/Lanczos (PP + RBM + 1st Lanczos step, spin-parity even, random...
-0.49229(7) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 2x2x2 (128 sites)
mVMC variance extrapolation (max. flip. initial state)
-0.49434(5) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 2x2x2 (128 sites)
mVMC (PP, spin-parity even), random initial state
-0.485451(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 2x2x2 (128 sites)
mVMC (PP, spin-parity even), max.-flippable dimer initial state
-0.486024(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 2x2x2 (128 sites)
mVMC-RBM (PP + RBM, spin-parity even)
-0.489089(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 2x2x2 (128 sites)
mVMC/Lanczos (PP + 1st Lanczos step, spin-parity even), random initial state
-0.490325(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 2x2x2 (128 sites)
mVMC/Lanczos (PP + 1st Lanczos step, spin-parity even), max.-flippable dimer initial state
-0.49098(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 2x2x2 (32 sites)
RBM with symmetry projections
-0.51523(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Astrakhantsev et al. (2021)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 2x2x2 (32 sites)
mVMC with SU(2) and symmetry projections
-0.51627(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Astrakhantsev et al. (2021)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 2x2x2 (32 sites)
SU(2) DMRG, extrapolated (χ→∞, linear fit vs two-site variance), snake path
-0.5168000 ○ E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Hagymási et al. (2020)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 3x3x3 (108 sites)
mVMC with SU(2) and symmetry projections
-0.48711(9) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Astrakhantsev et al. (2021)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 3x3x3 (108 sites)
CNN NQS with symmetry projections
-0.48259(9) E/N (S.S) · variational
Astrakhantsev et al. (2021)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 3x3x3 (108 sites)
DMRG
-0.4851000 E/N (S.S) · variational
Hagymási et al. (2021)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 3x3x3 (432 sites)
mVMC (PP + 1st step Lanczos, spin-parity projection, C3 point-group projection)
-0.48847(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 3x3x3 (432 sites)
mVMC variance extrapolation (max. flip. initial state)
-0.4924(2) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 3x3x3 (432 sites)
mVMC variance extrapolation (random initial state)
-0.4923(2) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 3x3x3 (432 sites)
mVMC (PP, spin-parity even, C3 projection), random initial state
-0.485243(7) E/N (S.S) · variational
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 3x3x3 (432 sites)
mVMC (PP, spin-parity even, C3 projection), max.-flippable dimer initial state
-0.485302(8) E/N (S.S) · variational
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 3x3x3 (432 sites)
mVMC/Lanczos (PP + 1st Lanczos step, spin-parity even, C3 projection), random initial...
-0.48851(3) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 4x4x4 (1024 sites)
mVMC (PP + 1st step Lanczos, spin-parity projection, C3 point-group projection)
-0.48800(1) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 4x4x4 (1024 sites)
mVMC (PP, spin-parity even, C3 projection), random initial state
-0.48537(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 4x4x4 (1024 sites)
mVMC and mVMC/Lanczos, extrapolated in the variance
-0.4921(2) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Pohle et al. (2023)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 4x4x4 (256 sites)
mVMC with SU(2) and symmetry projections
-0.48310(7) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Astrakhantsev et al. (2021)
Heisenberg pyrochlore 4x4x4 (256 sites)
Generalized RVB ansatz, unrestricted VMC optimization (no quantum-number projection)
-0.4855000 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Cheng & Li (2025)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
RNN
-0.628607(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
RNN + translational symmetry
-0.628649(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
DMRG (MaxTruncError ~1.87E-6, MaxBondDim=10000, Extrapolated Energy = - 251.4628 +/-...
-0.6286335 E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
2D Gated RNN
-0.628638(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hibat-Allah et al. (2022)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
PEPS (bond dimension = 10)
-0.6286010 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Liu et al. (2017)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
1D MPS-RNN (bond dimension = 40)
-0.62587(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Wu et al. (2023)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
2D MPS-RNN (bond dimension = 40)
-0.627697(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Wu et al. (2023)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
Tensor-RNN (bond dimension = 40)
-0.628528(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Wu et al. (2023)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.62276(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
Jastrow baseline
-0.62027(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
2D tensorized-GRU RNN wavefunction, best variational
-0.628656(9) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
2D minGRU (3 layers, c4v symmetry, parallel scan)
-0.628637(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Merali et al. (2026)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
PixelCNN (deep autoregressive)
-0.628627(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Sharir et al. (2020), quoted in Merali et al. (2026)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
Finite PEPS, gradient optimization
-0.628601(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Liu et al. (2017), quoted in Merali et al. (2026)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
PEPS, gradient optimization (GO) after SU initialization, D=8, Dc=16 (finite...
-0.628507(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Liu et al. (2016)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
PEPS, simple-update (SU) imaginary-time evolution, D=10, Dc=20 (finite, open-boundary...
-0.62611(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Liu et al. (2016)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
2D tensorized-GRU RNN, zero-variance extrapolation
-0.62864114(5) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
2D minGRU, 3 layers, c4v symmetry, iterative retraining (PSR-NQS)
-0.628605(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Merali et al. (2026)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
2D pRNN wave function (Marshall-sign-rotated, GRU cell, d_h=200) + Adam optimizer
-0.62840(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Attar et al. (2026)
Heisenberg square 10x10, open
2D pRNN wave function (Marshall-sign-rotated, GRU cell, d_h=200) + minSR optimizer...
-0.628486(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Attar et al. (2026)
Heisenberg square 10x10
VMC with fermions (flux+neel+Jastrow)
-0.66935(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 10x10
RNN
-0.671134(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 10x10
RNN + translational symmetry
-0.67140(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 10x10
DMRG (bond dimension = 1024)
-0.6648562 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 10x10
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.66443(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 10x10
Jastrow baseline
-0.66421(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 10x10
CNN + MinSR
-0.67155260(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen & Heyl (2023)
Heisenberg square 10x10
RBM + Lanczos recursion
-0.671519(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
Heisenberg square 10x10
2D RNN wavefunction (best variational)
-0.67151(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 10x10
CNN
-0.6713500 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Choo et al. (2019), quoted in Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 10x10
2D RNN wavefunction, zero-variance extrapolation
-0.6715950(5) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 10x10
Grassmann Variational Monte Carlo (GVMC): CNN backflow + complex RBM neural wave function...
-0.671544(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hendry et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 10x10
aCNN(C4v)
-0.671431(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Wang et al. (2023)
Heisenberg square 10x10
ViT
-0.6714760 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Golubev et al. (2026)
Heisenberg square 32x32
RNN (zero-variance)
-0.6694877(4) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 32x32
2D RNN wavefunction (best variational)
-0.66930(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 12x12, open
2D tensorized-GRU RNN wavefunction, best variational
-0.635201(7) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 12x12
RNN (zero-variance)
-0.6707008(1) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 12x12
2D RNN wavefunction (best variational)
-0.67062(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 4x4
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.7017449 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 4x4
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.7017252 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 14x14, open
2D tensorized-GRU RNN wavefunction, best variational
-0.639929(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 14x14
VMC with fermions (flux+neel+Jastrow)
-0.668346(8) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 14x14
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.66381(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 14x14
Jastrow baseline
-0.66256(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 14x14
2D tensorized-GRU RNN, zero-variance extrapolation
-0.6703092(5) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 14x14
2D RNN wavefunction (best variational)
-0.67014(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 16x16, open
2D minGRU (3 layers, c4v symmetry, parallel scan)
-0.643504(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
Merali et al. (2026)
Heisenberg square 16x16, open
PixelCNN (deep autoregressive)
-0.643448(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Sharir et al. (2020), quoted in Merali et al. (2026)
Heisenberg square 16x16, open
Finite PEPS, gradient optimization
-0.643391(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
Liu et al. (2017), quoted in Merali et al. (2026)
Heisenberg square 16x16, open
2D minGRU, 3 layers, c4v symmetry, iterative retraining (PSR-NQS)
-0.643396(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Merali et al. (2026)
Heisenberg square 16x16, open
NAQS
-0.643448(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Sharir et al. (2019)
Heisenberg square 16x16, open
2D tensorized-GRU RNN wavefunction, best variational
-0.643522(7) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 16x16
RNN (zero-variance)
-0.6699687(9) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 16x16
aCNN(C4v)
-0.669716(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Wang et al. (2023)
Heisenberg square 16x16
2D RNN wavefunction (best variational)
-0.66987(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 18x18, open
2D tensorized-GRU RNN wavefunction, best variational
-0.646337(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 18x18
RNN (zero-variance)
-0.6697819(5) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 18x18
2D RNN wavefunction (best variational)
-0.66968(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 6x6, open
DMRG (bond dimension = 2048)
-0.6035218 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 6x6, open
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.59365(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 6x6, open
Jastrow baseline
-0.59484(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 6x6, open
DMRG keeping 4096 states (quoted comparison value, labeled 'Exact' in the source table)
-0.6035218 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Huang et al. (2016), quoted in Liu et al. (2016)
Heisenberg square 6x6, open
LSTM
-0.6034170 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Roth (2020)
Heisenberg square 6x6, open
2D tensorized-GRU RNN, zero-variance extrapolation
-0.60351496(1) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 6x6, open
RNN
-0.603516(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hibat-Allah et al. (2022)
Heisenberg square 6x6, open
2D tensorized-GRU RNN wavefunction, best variational
-0.603517(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 6x6, open
Static RNN (hidden dim 256)
-0.603483(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
McNaughton & Hibat-Allah (2025)
Heisenberg square 6x6, open
Adaptive RNN (hidden dim 32->256, doubling)
-0.603497(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
McNaughton & Hibat-Allah (2025)
Heisenberg square 6x6, open
Adaptive RNN with Early Stopping (hidden dim 2->256)
-0.603486(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
McNaughton & Hibat-Allah (2025)
Heisenberg square 6x6
DMRG (bond dimension = 2048)
-0.6786224 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 6x6
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.66854(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 6x6
Jastrow baseline
-0.66974(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg square 6x6
RBM + Lanczos recursion
-0.678868(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
Heisenberg square 6x6
2D RNN wavefunction (best variational)
-0.67887(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 6x6
CNN
-0.67882(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Choo et al. (2019), quoted in Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 6x6
2D RNN wavefunction, zero-variance extrapolation
-0.67887177(7) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 6x6
Grassmann Variational Monte Carlo (GVMC): CNN (ConvNeXt-style) backflow + complex RBM...
-0.678871(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hendry et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 6x6
CNN amplitude+phase NQS, O-tilde method (SR), Eq.(22)
-0.6788000 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Ou et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 6x6
EPS (entangled-plaquette states) VMC, as cited by this source
-0.6785(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Mezzacapo et al. (2009), quoted in Ou et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 6x6
ViT
-0.6788700 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Golubev et al. (2026)
Heisenberg square 20x20, open
2D tensorized-GRU RNN wavefunction, best variational
-0.648590(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 20x20
RNN (zero-variance)
-0.6697420(6) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 20x20
2D RNN wavefunction (best variational)
-0.66959(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 24x24, open
2D tensorized-GRU RNN wavefunction, best variational
-0.651982(7) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 24x24
RNN (zero-variance)
-0.6696127(5) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 24x24
aCNN(C4v)
-0.669237(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Wang et al. (2023)
Heisenberg square 24x24
2D RNN wavefunction (best variational)
-0.66944(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 8x8, open
PEPS, GO method, D=8, Dc=16
-0.619013(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Liu et al. (2016)
Heisenberg square 8x8, open
PEPS, GO method, D=10, Dc=20
-0.619033(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
Liu et al. (2016)
Heisenberg square 8x8, open
2D tensorized-GRU RNN wavefunction, best variational
-0.61905(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 8x8
RNN (zero-variance)
-0.6735047(2) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 8x8
RBM
-0.673482(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
Heisenberg square 8x8
ViT
-0.6734340 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Golubev et al. (2026)
Heisenberg square 8x8
2D RNN wavefunction (best variational)
-0.67346(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 28x28
RNN (zero-variance)
-0.6695580(4) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg square 28x28
2D RNN wavefunction (best variational)
-0.66937(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg triangular, 108 sites
GCNN (deep group-equivariant CNN)
-0.55315(3) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Roth et al. (2022)
Heisenberg triangular, 108 sites
Graph neural network
-0.5519(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Kochkov et al. (2021)
Heisenberg triangular 12x12
VMC with Dirac+field+Jastrow
-0.54624(2) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg triangular 12x12
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.48966(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg triangular 12x12
Jastrow baseline
-0.48552(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg triangular 4x4
VQE (SR + symm. + 64 par)
-0.5340324 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg triangular 4x4
DMRG (bond dimension = 256)
-0.5347197 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg triangular 4x4
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.52417(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg triangular 4x4
Jastrow baseline
-0.51710(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg triangular 6x6
DMRG (bond dimension = 2048)
-0.5581022 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg triangular 6x6
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.49161(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg triangular 6x6
Jastrow baseline
-0.48678(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Heisenberg triangular 6x6
Group CNN (deep, symmetry-projected)
-0.560313(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
Roth et al. (2022)
Heisenberg triangular 6x6
Lattice Convolutional Network
-0.5601(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Fu et al. (2022)
Heisenberg triangular 6x6
Group CNN
-0.5592200 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Roth & MacDonald (2021)
Heisenberg triangular 6x6
2D RNN wavefunction (iterative retraining, s=4.0, r=0.158)
-0.5562(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg triangular 6x6
NN + Gutzwiller
-0.5530000 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Ferrari et al. (2019), quoted in Roth & MacDonald (2021)
Heisenberg triangular 6x6
VMC
-0.5551900 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Kaneko et al. (2014), quoted in Roth & MacDonald (2021)
Heisenberg triangular 6x6
VMC
-0.5542000 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Mezzacapo & Cirac (2010), quoted in Roth & MacDonald (2021)
Heisenberg triangular 6x6
VMC
-0.5480250 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Iqbal et al. (2016), quoted in Roth & MacDonald (2021)
Heisenberg triangular 6x6
Projected mean field
-0.543(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Weber et al. (2006), quoted in Moss et al. (2025)
Heisenberg triangular 6x6
Projected mean field ansatz
-0.55148(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
Heidarian et al. (2009), quoted in Moss et al. (2025)
Hubbard chain, 14 sites, U = 1, n ≈ 0.5714
DMRG (MaxBondDim = 1550, Extrap Energy = -12.762823 +/- 2.e-6)
-0.9116293 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard chain, 14 sites, U = 1.66810054, n ≈ 0.5714
DMRG (maxbonddim = 1550, extrapolated energy -12.266149729 +/- 5E-8)
-0.8761535 E/site · extrapolated
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard chain, 14 sites, U = 10, n ≈ 0.5714
DMRG (MaxBondDim ~1500, Extrap Eng = -9.9450941 +/- 2.9e-7)
-0.7103637 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard chain, 14 sites, U = 2.15443469, n ≈ 0.5714
DMRG (MaxBondDim ~1500)
-0.8542284 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard chain, 14 sites, U = 2.7825594, n ≈ 0.5714
DMRG (MaxBondDim ~1500)
-0.8300032 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard chain, 14 sites, U = 3.59381366, n ≈ 0.5714
DMRG (MaxBondDim ~1500)
-0.8043230 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard chain, 14 sites, U = 4.64158882, n ≈ 0.5714
DMRG (MaxBondDim ~1500)
-0.7783541 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard chain, 14 sites, U = 7.74263683, n ≈ 0.5714
DMRG (MaxBondDim ~1500)
-0.7304717 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard rectangular 14x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
VAFQMC stripe length=7
-0.75830(4) E/site · variationalrecord
Sorella (2023)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 16. Single hidden layer fully...
-0.75300(5) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
ACE (16 conv layers) trial state + fixed-node GFMC
-0.76647(2) E/site · projected
Gu et al. (2026)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
ACE (16 conv layers) + full symmetry projection
-0.76623(1) E/site · variationalrecord
Gu et al. (2026)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
NNBF, 32 determinants + free projection to the fully symmetric state
-0.76560(1) E/site · variational
Loehr & Clark (2025)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
NNBF, symmetry optimization with 32 determinants
-0.76486(2) E/site · variational
Loehr & Clark (2025)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
ACE (16 conv layers), no explicit symmetry
-0.76464(1) E/site · variational
Gu et al. (2026)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
Transformer backflow + MARCH optimizer
-0.7629800 ○ E/site · variational
Gu et al. (2025)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
HFPS (hidden-fermion Pfaffian state)
-0.76413(3) E/site · variational
Chen et al. (2025)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
Hierarchical Backflow (HB) VMC, path depth K=0 (Hartree-Fock)
-0.6035000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
Hierarchical Backflow (HB) VMC, path depth K=1
-0.7585000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
Hierarchical Backflow (HB) VMC, path depth K=2
-0.7597000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
Residual Hierarchical Backflow (RHB) VMC (HB K=2 backbone + FNN, Ndet=5, Nneuron=100)
-0.7611000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
Neural Network Backflow (NNB) VMC, quoted from ref [31]
-0.7460000 ○ E/site · variational
Luo & Clark (2019), quoted in Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
BW1 (p=1)
-0.7597000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2023)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
BW2 (p=1)
-0.7618000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2023)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
MLP-NNBF, n_h=8192 (2-layer)
-0.76258(1) E/site · variational
Loehr & Clark (2025)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
zero-variance extrapolation (NNBF + symmetrized variants)
-0.7674800 ○ E/site · extrapolated
Loehr & Clark (2025)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
MLP-NNBF, 4 determinants (symmetry-optimized)
-0.76340(2) E/site · variational
Loehr & Clark (2025)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
HFPS (initialized without a pairing field, metastable state)
-0.7625600 ○ E/site · variational
Chen et al. (2025)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
base MLP-NNBF, n_h=128
-0.75066(2) E/site · variational
Loehr & Clark (2025)
Hubbard rectangular 4x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
Tensor-Backflow family, zero-variance extrapolation, PBC
-0.7642000 ○ E/site · extrapolated
Liang (2025)
Hubbard rectangular 4x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 16. Single hidden layer fully...
-0.76331(6) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard rectangular 4x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
HFPS (hidden-fermion Pfaffian state)
-0.76690(1) E/site · variational
Chen et al. (2025)
Hubbard rectangular 4x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
RHB (hierarchical backflow K = 2 + nonlocal FNN factor, Ndet = 5, Nneuron = 100)
-0.7641(3) E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard rectangular 4x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
Hierarchical Backflow (HB) VMC, path depth K=0 (Hartree-Fock)
-0.6146000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard rectangular 4x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
Hierarchical Backflow (HB) VMC, path depth K=1
-0.7599000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard rectangular 4x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
Hierarchical Backflow (HB) VMC, path depth K=2
-0.7617000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard rectangular 4x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
Neural Network Backflow (NNB) VMC, quoted from ref [31]
-0.7550000 ○ E/site · variational
Luo & Clark (2019), quoted in Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard rectangular 4x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
MLP-NNBF, 128 determinants, symmetry-optimized+projected
-0.768337(2) E/site · variationalrecord
Loehr & Clark (2025)
Hubbard rectangular 4x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
zero-variance extrapolation (NNBF + symmetrized variants)
-0.7684160 ○ E/site · extrapolated
Loehr & Clark (2025)
Hubbard rectangular 4x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
BW1 (p=1)
-0.7591000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2023)
Hubbard rectangular 4x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
BW2 (p=1)
-0.7633000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2023)
Hubbard rectangular 6x48, U = 8, n = 0.875
VMC with stripe of wavelength 8 (+Jastrow and backflow)
-0.74834(3) E/site · variationalrecord
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard rectangular 6x48, U = 8, n = 0.875
FN on the state above
-0.75398(2) E/site · projected
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard rectangular 6x48, U = 8, n = 0.875
VMC with uniform BCS pairing (+Jastrow and backflow)
-0.74365(3) E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard rectangular 6x48, U = 8, n = 0.875
FN on the state above
-0.74997(2) E/site · projected
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 10x10, U = 2, n = 1
HB K = 1
-1.1677000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 10x10, U = 4, n = 1
HB K = 1
-0.8585000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 10x10, U = 6, n = 1
HB K = 1
-0.6550000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 10x10, U = 8, n = 1
HB K = 0 (HF)
-0.4690000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 10x10, U = 8, n = 1
HB K = 1
-0.5226000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 10x10, U = 8, n = 1
HB K = 2
-0.5240000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 10x10, U = 8, n = 1
NQS (transformer-based backflow ansatz)
-0.5249200 ○ E/site · variational
Gu et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 10x10, U = 8, n = 1
BW1 (p=1)
-0.5181000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2023)
Hubbard square 10x10, U = 8, n = 1
BW2 (p=1)
-0.5230000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2023)
Hubbard square 12x12, U = 8, n = 1
Tensor-Backflow (E_p=0, no Lanczos step)
-0.5209000 ○ E/site · variational
Liang (2025)
Hubbard square 12x12, U = 8, n = 1
Tensor-Backflow (E_p=1, one Lanczos step)
-0.5224000 ○ E/site · variational
Liang (2025)
Hubbard square 12x12, U = 8, n = 1
NQS (transformer-based backflow ansatz)
-0.5244000 ○ E/site · variational
Gu et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 12x12, periodic/antiperiodic, U = 8, n = 1
Tensor-Backflow (E_p=0, no Lanczos step)
-0.5205000 ○ E/site · variational
Liang (2025)
Hubbard square 12x12, periodic/antiperiodic, U = 8, n = 1
Tensor-Backflow (E_p=1, one Lanczos step)
-0.5224000 ○ E/site · variational
Liang (2025)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 10, n = 0.5
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 8. Single hidden layer fully...
-1.008644(6) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 10, n = 0.5
DMRG (MaxBondDim = 3200)
-1.0089505 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 2, n = 0.5
DMRG (MaxLinkDim ~ 3200)
-1.1559648 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 3.5981, n = 0.5
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 8. Single hidden layer fully...
-1.105848(3) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 3.5981, n = 0.5
DMRG (MaxBondDim ~3200)
-1.1060144 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 4, n = 0.5
DMRG (MaxBondDim ~ 3200)
-1.0959310 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 6, n = 0.5
DMRG (MaxBondDim ~ 3200)
-1.0562454 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 7.74264, n = 0.5
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 8. Single hidden layer fully...
-1.031562(6) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 7.74264, n = 0.5
DMRG (MaxBondDim ~3200)
-1.0318221 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 8, n = 0.5
DMRG (MaxBondDim ~ 3200)
-1.0287892 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 10, n = 0.625
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 10. Single hidden layer fully...
-1.056364(1) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 10, n = 0.625
DMRG (MaxBondDim = 7000)
-1.0564725 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 10, n = 0.625
HFPS + CNN Jastrow, VMC
-1.056468(9) E/site · variational
Chen et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 2, n = 0.625
DMRG (MaxBondDim = 7000)
-1.3360594 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 2.1544, n = 0.625
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 10. Single hidden layer fully...
-1.3257435(1) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 2.1544, n = 0.625
DMRG (MaxBondDim 7000)
-1.3257670 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 3.5981, n = 0.625
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 10. Single hidden layer fully...
-1.2431527(4) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 3.5981, n = 0.625
DMRG (MaxBondDim = 7000)
-1.2430143 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 4, n = 0.625
DMRG (MaxBondDim = 7000)
-1.2238086 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 4, n = 0.625
Hidden-Fermion Pfaffian State (HFPS) + CNN Jastrow, VMC, small-scale (no sublattice...
-1.223807(7) E/site · variational
Chen et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 6, n = 0.625
DMRG (MaxBondDim = 7000)
-1.1473978 ○ E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 6, n = 0.625
HFPS + CNN Jastrow, VMC
-1.147396(7) E/site · variational
Chen et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 7.74264, n = 0.625
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 10. Single hidden layer fully...
-1.1001250(6) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 7.74264, n = 0.625
DMRG (MaxBondDim = 7000)
-1.1002331 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 8, n = 0.625
DMRG (MaxBondDim = 7000)
-1.0943979 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 8, n = 0.625
HFPS + CNN Jastrow, VMC
-1.094396(4) E/site · variational
Chen et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 2, n = 1
HB K = 1
-1.1248000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 4, n = 1
HB K = 1
-0.8486000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 4, n = 1
TQS
-0.8511(1) E/site · variational
Yamazaki et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 4, n = 1
PITQS
-0.8511(2) E/site · variational
Yamazaki et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 6, n = 1
HB K = 1
-0.6577000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 8, n = 1
HB K = 0 (HF)
-0.4898000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 8, n = 1
HB K = 1
-0.5281000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 8, n = 1
HB K = 2
-0.5291000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 8, n = 1
TQS
-0.5291(3) E/site · variational
Yamazaki et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 4x4, U = 8, n = 1
PITQS
-0.5292(3) E/site · variational
Yamazaki et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
VMC with stripe of wavelength 8 (+Jastrow and backflow)
-0.74885(2) E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
FN on the state above
-0.75438(4) E/site · projected
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
VMC with uniform BCS pairing (+Jastrow and backflow)
-0.74395(3) E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
FN on the state above
-0.74991(3) E/site · projected
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
VAFQMC stripe length 8
-0.75865(3) E/site · variationalrecord
Sorella (2023)
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
ACE (16 conv layers) trial state + fixed-node GFMC
-0.7583000 ○ E/site · projected
Gu et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
ACE (16 conv layers), no symmetry projection
-0.7573000 ○ E/site · variational
Gu et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
Transformer backflow
-0.7563000 ○ E/site · variational
Gu et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
SCALE (1 conv layer) trial state + fixed-node GFMC
-0.7560000 ○ E/site · projected
Gu et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
Tensor-Backflow + Lanczos
-0.7552000 ○ E/site · variational
Liang (2025)
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
SCALE (1 conv layer), no symmetry projection
-0.7529000 ○ E/site · variational
Gu et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
HFPS + symmetry projection
-0.7515(1) E/site · variational
Gu et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
Tensor-Backflow
-0.7509000 ○ E/site · variational
Liang (2025)
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
VMC benchmark (quoted reference column)
-0.7544500 ○ E/site · variational
Wu et al. (2024), quoted in Liang (2025)
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
HB K=1
-0.7510000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
HB K=2
-0.7526000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 16x16, U = 8, n = 0.875
RHB (HB K=2 backbone + FNN)
-0.7543(2) E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 16x16, periodic/antiperiodic, U = 8, n = 1
mVMC with SU(2) and momentum projections (gamma point) + RBM + Lanczos, (U=8)
-0.51898(2) E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 16x16, periodic/antiperiodic, U = 8, n = 1
VAFQMC
-0.52427(4) E/site · variational
Sorella (2023)
Hubbard square 6x6, U = 2, n = 1
HB K = 1
-1.1506000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 6x6, U = 4, n = 1
HB K = 1
-0.8554000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 6x6, U = 8, n = 1
HB K = 0 (HF)
-0.4797000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 6x6, U = 8, n = 1
HB K = 1
-0.5255000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 6x6, U = 8, n = 1
HB K = 2
-0.5266000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 6x6, U = 8, n = 1
BW1 (p=1)
-0.5186000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2023)
Hubbard square 6x6, U = 8, n = 1
BW2 (p=1)
-0.5257000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2023)
Hubbard square 6x6, periodic/antiperiodic, U = 2, n = 1
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 8, fully parametrized hidden...
-1.2079(1) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 6x6, periodic/antiperiodic, U = 4, n = 1
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 16. Single hidden layer fully...
-0.87173(2) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 6x6, periodic/antiperiodic, U = 6, n = 1
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 16. Single hidden layer fully...
-0.66094(3) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 6x6, periodic/antiperiodic, U = 8, n = 1
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 16. Single hidden layer fully...
-0.52705(3) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = -8, n = 0.875
ACE (Accurate Convolutional ansatz for lattice Electrons; deep convolutional backflow NQS)
-4.0165000 ○ E/site · variational
Gu et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = -8, n = 0.875
SCALE (Sparse Convolutional Ansatz for Lattice Electrons; efficient backflow NQS)
-4.0161000 ○ E/site · variational
Gu et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = -8, n = 0.875
SCALE+GFMC (GFMC projection on the SCALE trial state)
-4.0167000 ○ E/site · projected
Gu et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = -8, n = 0.875
ACE+GFMC (GFMC projection on the ACE trial state)
-4.0168000 ○ E/site · projected
Gu et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = -8, n = 0.875
Det
-3.9950(1) E/site · variational
Viteritti et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = -8, n = 0.875
Det, T
-4.0152(1) E/site · variational
Viteritti et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = -8, n = 0.875
Det-PH
-4.0167(1) E/site · variational
Viteritti et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = -8, n = 0.875
Pfaffian
-4.0169(1) E/site · variational
Viteritti et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
VMC with uniform BCS pairing (+Jastrow and backflow)
-0.74220(3) E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
FN on the state above
-0.74928(2) E/site · projected
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
Jastrow-backflow (JBf), 8x8 torus
-0.7458(6) E/site · variational
Sharma et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
Hidden-fermion determinant state (HFDS), 8x8 torus
-0.7454(9) E/site · variational
Sharma et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
JBf-ViT (vision transformer backflow), 8x8 torus
-0.7422(3) E/site · variational
Sharma et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
HFDS-ViT, 8x8 torus
-0.736(1) E/site · variational
Sharma et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
HFDS Symm-ViT-Ti, 8x8 torus
-0.729(4) E/site · variational
Sharma et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
JBf Symm-ViT-Ti, 8x8 torus
-0.726(9) E/site · variational
Sharma et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
AFQMC (constrained-path)
-0.7616(1) E/site · projected
Shi & Zhang (2013), quoted in Levy et al. (2023)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 0.875
VAFQMC (N_l=4)
-0.7469(2) E/site · variationalrecord
Levy et al. (2023)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = -4, n = 1
HFPS + sublattice-symmetric CNN Jastrow (VMC)
-2.8595780 † E/site · variational
Chen et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = -8, n = 1
HFPS + sublattice-symmetric CNN Jastrow, VMC
-4.5258340 † E/site · variational
Chen et al. (2025)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 2, n = 1
HB K = 1
-1.1626000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 4, n = 1
mVMC with SU(2) and momentum projections (gamma point) + RBM + Lanczos, (U=4), alpha = 4
-0.859156(8) E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 4, n = 1
VMC with Neel AF (+Jastrow and backflow)
-0.85651(1) E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 4, n = 1
FN on the state above
-0.857653(9) E/site · projected
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 4, n = 1
Hierarchical Backflow (HB) VMC, path depth K=1
-0.8581000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 6, n = 1
HB K = 1
-0.6554000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 1
mVMC with SU(2) and momentum projections (gamma point) + RBM + Lanczos, (U=8) (Ne = 64)...
-0.52459(1) E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 1
Hartree-Fock (K=0 hierarchical-backflow baseline, single Slater determinant)
-0.4743000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 1
Hierarchical Backflow (HB) VMC, path depth K=1
-0.5229000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 1
Hierarchical Backflow (HB) VMC, path depth K=2
-0.5245000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2026)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 1
BW1 (p=1)
-0.5188000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2023)
Hubbard square 8x8, U = 8, n = 1
BW2 (p=1)
-0.5241000 ○ E/site · variational
Zhou et al. (2023)
Hubbard square 8x8, periodic/antiperiodic, U = 2, n = 1
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 16. Single hidden layer fully...
-1.19003(9) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 8x8, periodic/antiperiodic, U = 4, n = 1
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 16. Single hidden layer fully...
-0.8622(2) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 8x8, periodic/antiperiodic, U = 6, n = 1
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 16, fully parametrized hidden...
-0.6574(2) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 8x8, periodic/antiperiodic, U = 8, n = 1
VMC Hidden Fermion Determinant State Ansatz (N_hidden = 16. Single hidden layer fully...
-0.5245(2) E/site · variational
Moreno et al. (2022)
Hubbard square 8x8, periodic/open, U = 8, n = 1
DMRG (MaxLinkDim=10000, MaxTruncErr ~ 3.4E-5, Extrap Energy -32.0027 +/- 0.0206)
-0.4984344 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Hubbard square 8x8, periodic/open, U = 8, n = 1
VAFQMC
-0.49944(4) E/site · variational
Sorella (2023)
Impurity SB-DMFT-MI-HF, size 9
DMRG (bond dimension 100) using fork tensor product states with U(1) symmetries for...
-34.5805205 E (total) · variational
Bauernfeind et al. (2017)
Impurity SB-DMFT-MT-AHF, size 9
DMRG (bond dimension 100) using fork tensor product states with U(1) symmetries for...
-13.8893249 E (total) · variational
Bauernfeind et al. (2017)
Impurity SB-DMFT-MT-HF, size 9
DMRG (bond dimension 100) using fork tensor product states with U(1) symmetries for...
-23.3009472 E (total) · variational
Bauernfeind et al. (2017)
Impurity SB-IMP, size 9
DMRG (bond dimension 100) using fork tensor product states with U(1) symmetries for...
-10.4871285 E (total) · variational
Bauernfeind et al. (2017)
J1-J2 rectangular 4x6, J2 = 0.5
VQE + symm. circuit (96 pars., Ns = 2^14 per par, statevector)
-0.5218026 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 rectangular 4x6, J2 = 0.5
VQE + symm. circuit (96 pars., exact grads & metric, statevector)
-0.5218948 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 rectangular 4x6, J2 = 0.5
DMRG (bond dimension = 4096)
-0.5225249 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 rectangular 4x6, J2 = 0.5
Jastrow baseline
-0.50694(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 rectangular 4x6, J2 = 0.5
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.51326(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
VMC with projected BCS (Z2 spin liquid)
-0.49515(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
RBM+PP with momentum (K=0), spin-parity (even S), and point-group (A1) projections, 16...
-0.497629(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Nomura & Imada (2021)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
RNN
-0.495393(8) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
RNN + translational symmetry
-0.49560(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
DMRG (bond dimension = 1024)
-0.4913983 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.47700(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
Jastrow baseline
-0.47390(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
ResNet2 (64 conv layers, >1e6 params), MinSR
-0.4976921(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen & Heyl (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
ResNet2 MinSR, zero-variance extrapolation
-0.497715(9) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Chen & Heyl (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
fViT (vision transformer, 2.7e5 params)
-0.497634(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Rende et al. (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
ConvNext (6,3,3)[2,2], 2.6e5 params
-0.497583(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Nutakki et al. (2025)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
CNN-MPS (h,D,l)=(32,20,20), Marshall sign transformation
-0.4976939(2) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Fan et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
T-MPS
-0.4976923(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Fan et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
Convolutional transformer wave function (CTWF)
-0.4976764(7) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2025)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
VMC, p = 0 Lanczos steps
-0.49521(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
VMC + 1 Lanczos step
-0.49718(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
VMC + 2 Lanczos steps
-0.49755(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
VMC + Lanczos steps, extrapolated in the variance
-0.49781(2) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
DMRG on the L x L torus, 4096 SU(2) states
-0.4950440 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
DMRG on the L x L torus, 6144 SU(2) states
-0.4953010 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
DMRG on the L x L torus, 8192 SU(2) states
-0.4955300 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
DMRG, extrapolated in the truncation error (4096-8192 SU(2) states)
-0.4988000 ○ E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
RBM wave function, no Lanczos
-0.49580(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
RBM wave function + 1-step Lanczos recursion
-0.4968(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
MLP
-0.48941(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Ledinauskas & Anisimovas (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
CNN
-0.49476(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Szabó & Castelnovo (2020), quoted in Rende et al. (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
Shallow CNN
-0.4947359(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Liang et al. (2018), quoted in Rende et al. (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
aCNN
-0.495627(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Wang et al. (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
RBM-fermionic
-0.49575(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
Ferrari et al. (2019), quoted in Rende et al. (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
CNN
-0.49586(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Reh et al. (2023), quoted in Rende et al. (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
Deep CNN
-0.49717(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Li et al. (2022), quoted in Rende et al. (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
GCNN
-0.497437(7) E/N (S.S) · variational
Roth et al. (2023), quoted in Rende et al. (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
Deep CNN
-0.497468(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Liang et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
VMC (p = 2)
-0.4975490(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013), quoted in Rende et al. (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
Deep CNN
-0.497627(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen & Heyl (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
HQT (Ours), Cold Start
-0.4974000 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Guo et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
A5 residual-CNN, LR=0.005, seed 8 (HPO-selected)
-0.495892(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Wang et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
A5 residual-CNN, LR=0.002, seed 9 (HPO-selected)
-0.495959(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
Wang et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
A9 residual-CNN (wide-shallow), LR=0.008, seed 9 (HPO-selected)
-0.495941(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Wang et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
CNN
-0.49516(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Choo et al. (2019)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
CNN, REMD [73]
-0.4736000 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Liang et al. (2018), quoted in Ledinauskas & Anisimovas (2023)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
S. CNN
-0.4829860 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Liang et al. (2020)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
PEPS+S. CNN
-0.4923350 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Liang et al. (2020)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
PEPS+D. CNN
-0.4955020 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Liang et al. (2020)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
T5 attention (ViT, h=10,d=60,b=2,nl=4)
-0.497025(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Rende & Viteritti (2024)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
Decoupled attention (ViT, h=10,d=60,b=2,nl=4)
-0.497108(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Rende & Viteritti (2024)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
Factored attention (ViT, h=10,d=60,b=2,nl=4)
-0.497184(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Rende & Viteritti (2024)
J1-J2 square 10x10, J2 = 0.5
ViT
-0.4967830 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Golubev et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 12x12, J2 = 0.5
GCNN (deep group-convolutional network)
-0.496769(9) E/N (S.S) · variational
Roth et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 12x12, J2 = 0.5
mVMC + RBM (as quoted)
-0.496791(4) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Nomura & Imada (2021), quoted in Roth et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.05
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.6805657 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.05
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.6804795 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.1
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.6597832 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.1
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.6597647 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.15
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.6395066 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.15
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.6395107 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.2
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.6198639 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.2
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.6198018 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.25
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.6009332 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.25
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.6009187 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.3
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.5829420 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.3
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.5829522 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.35
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.5662285 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.35
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.5662099 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.4
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.5511033 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.4
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.5511135 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.45
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.5382766 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.45
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.5382744 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.5
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.5286173 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.5
DMRG (bond dimension = 256)
-0.5286202 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.5
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.51597(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.5
Jastrow baseline
-0.50798(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.5
ClebschTree
-0.528610(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
Vieijra & Nys (2021)
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.6
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.5258158 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.6
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.5257913 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.65
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.5393444 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.65
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.5390826 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.7
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.5637643 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.7
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.5637716 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.75
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.5942152 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.75
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.5941871 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.8
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.6273137 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.8
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.6272153 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.85
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.6617069 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.85
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.6615474 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.9
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.6967967 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.9
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.6967130 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.95
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.7324804 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 0.95
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.7324222 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 1
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., exact grad, statevector)
-0.7684501 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 4x4, J2 = 1
VQE + symm. circuit (64 pars., 2^14 samples/grad)
-0.7683608 † E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 14x14, J2 = 0.5
VMC with projected BCS (Z2 spin liquid)
-0.49443(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 14x14, J2 = 0.5
DMRG (bond dimension = 512)
-0.4823778 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 14x14, J2 = 0.5
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.47069(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 14x14, J2 = 0.5
Jastrow baseline
-0.47230(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 14x14, J2 = 0.5
VMC, p = 0 Lanczos steps
-0.49447(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 14x14, J2 = 0.5
VMC + 1 Lanczos step
-0.49638(1) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 14x14, J2 = 0.5
VMC + Lanczos steps, extrapolated in the variance
-0.49722(2) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 16x16, J2 = 0.5
ResNet2 (64 conv layers), MinSR
-0.4967163(8) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen & Heyl (2023)
J1-J2 square 16x16, J2 = 0.5
CNN-MPS
-0.4969140(5) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Fan et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 16x16, J2 = 0.5
T-MPS
-0.496786(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Fan et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 16x16, J2 = 0.5
CNN (Li et al. 2022, sunway supercomputer)
-0.4962600 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Li et al. (2021)
J1-J2 square 16x16, J2 = 0.5
GCNN
-0.496509(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Roth et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 16x16, J2 = 0.5
many-variable Gutzwiller-projected spinon-mean-field + RBM (mVMC, Ref. [7])
-0.496213(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
Nomura & Imada (2021), quoted in Roth et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 16x16, J2 = 0.55
GCNN (deep group-convolutional network)
-0.485583(8) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Roth et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 16x16, J2 = 0.55
mVMC + RBM (as quoted)
-0.485208(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Nomura & Imada (2021), quoted in Roth et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 18x18, J2 = 0.5
VMC, p = 0 Lanczos steps
-0.49426(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 18x18, J2 = 0.5
VMC + 1 Lanczos step
-0.49611(1) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 18x18, J2 = 0.5
VMC + Lanczos steps, extrapolated in the variance
-0.49717(2) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.3
DMRG (bond dimension = 2048)
-0.5618876 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.3
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.55500(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.3
Jastrow baseline
-0.55004(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.3
ViT
-0.5624530 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Golubev et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
DMRG (bond dimension = 2048)
-0.5289188 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.51953(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
Jastrow baseline
-0.51321(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
RBM wave function
-0.529687(7) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
CNN
-0.52936(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Choo et al. (2019), quoted in Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
VMC, p = 0 Lanczos steps
-0.52715(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
VMC + 1 Lanczos step
-0.52928(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
VMC + 2 Lanczos steps
-0.52957(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
VMC + Lanczos steps, extrapolated in the variance
-0.52972(1) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
DMRG on the L x L torus, 4096 SU(2) states
-0.5297340 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
DMRG on the L x L torus, 6144 SU(2) states
-0.5297420 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
DMRG on the L x L torus, 8192 SU(2) states
-0.5297440 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
DMRG, extrapolated in the truncation error (4096-8192 SU(2) states)
-0.529747(1) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.4
ViT
-0.5295470 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Golubev et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
RBM+PP with momentum (K=0), spin-parity (even S), and point-group (A1) projections, 16...
-0.503800(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Nomura & Imada (2021)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
RBM with momentum (K=0), spin-parity (even S), and point-group (A1) projections, 72...
-0.5037597(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Nomura (2021)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
VMC with projected BCS (Z2 spin liquid)
-0.50116(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
DMRG (bond dimension = 2048)
-0.5025975 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.48693(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
Jastrow baseline
-0.47820(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
RBM wave function + 2-step Lanczos recursion
-0.50378(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
RBM wave function + 1-step Lanczos recursion
-0.50376(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
RBM wave function
-0.50364(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
CNN
-0.50185(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Choo et al. (2019), quoted in Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
VMC, p = 0 Lanczos steps
-0.50117(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
VMC + 1 Lanczos step
-0.50323(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
VMC + 2 Lanczos steps
-0.50357(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
VMC + Lanczos steps, extrapolated in the variance
-0.50382(1) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
DMRG on the L x L torus, 4096 SU(2) states
-0.5037710 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
DMRG on the L x L torus, 6144 SU(2) states
-0.5037970 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
DMRG on the L x L torus, 8192 SU(2) states
-0.5038050 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
DMRG, extrapolated in the truncation error (4096-8192 SU(2) states)
-0.503808(1) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
NQS (CNN+FCN sign-structure ansatz, 2745 parameters, 2000 MC samples), best-performing...
-0.5004000 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Ou et al. (2025)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
VMC2 (entangled-plaquette states VMC)
-0.4985(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Mezzacapo et al. (2009), quoted in Ou et al. (2025)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
GNN
-0.5022(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Kochkov et al. (2021)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
GNN-2
-0.5023(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
Kochkov et al. (2021)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
aCNN
-0.503258(4) E/N (S.S) · variational
Wang et al. (2023)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
T5 attention (ViT, h=10,d=60,b=2,nl=4)
-0.503182(9) E/N (S.S) · variational
Rende & Viteritti (2024)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
Decoupled attention (ViT, h=10,d=60,b=2,nl=4)
-0.503243(9) E/N (S.S) · variational
Rende & Viteritti (2024)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
Factored attention (ViT, h=10,d=60,b=2,nl=4)
-0.503216(8) E/N (S.S) · variational
Rende & Viteritti (2024)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
CNN1 (VMC, 100 SR steps)
-0.5002000 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Liang et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.5
ViT
-0.5029700 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Golubev et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.6
DMRG (bond dimension = 2048)
-0.4926952 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.6
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.48067(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.6
Jastrow baseline
-0.47381(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.6
RBM wave function + 2-step Lanczos recursion
-0.49318(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.6
RBM wave function + 1-step Lanczos recursion
-0.49313(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.6
RBM wave function
-0.49298(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.6
CNN
-0.49023(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Choo et al. (2019), quoted in Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.6
ViT
-0.4907550 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Golubev et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.7
DMRG (bond dimension = 2048)
-0.5299243 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.7
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.52759(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.7
Jastrow baseline
-0.48312(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.7
RBM wave function
-0.529921(8) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.7
ViT
-0.5298840 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Golubev et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.8
DMRG (bond dimension = 2048)
-0.5857836 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.8
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.58422(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.8
Jastrow baseline
-0.57650(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.8
RBM wave function
-0.586411(9) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.8
CNN
-0.58590(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Choo et al. (2019), quoted in Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.8
ViT
-0.5857800 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Golubev et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.9
DMRG (bond dimension = 2048)
-0.6478705 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.9
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.64165(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.9
Jastrow baseline
-0.63702(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 0.9
ViT
-0.6473710 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Golubev et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 1
DMRG (bond dimension = 2048)
-0.7130465 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 1
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.70921(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 1
Jastrow baseline
-0.70016(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 1
RBM wave function
-0.71429(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 1
CNN
-0.71351(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Choo et al. (2019), quoted in Chen et al. (2022)
J1-J2 square 6x6, J2 = 1
ViT
-0.7124130 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Golubev et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 20x20, J2 = 0.5
CNN-MPS (h,D,l)=(32,15,20)
-0.4967987(6) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Fan et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 20x20, J2 = 0.5
ViT with symmetry restoration
-0.496732(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Viteritti et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 20x20, J2 = 0.5
ViT with Spatial Attention, zero-variance extrapolation
-0.49684(1) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Viteritti et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
RBM+PP with momentum (K=0), spin-parity (even S), and point-group (A1) projections, 16...
-0.498963(2) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Nomura & Imada (2021)
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
RBM with momentum (K=0), spin-parity (even S), and point-group (A1) projections, 96...
-0.498666(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
Nomura (2021)
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
VMC with projected BCS (Z2 spin liquid)
-0.49654(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
DMRG (bond dimension = 1024)
-0.4940154 E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
RBM (alpha = 1)
-0.48270(2) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
Jastrow baseline
-0.47459(3) E/N (S.S) · variational
run script, no paper cited
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
ClebschTree
-0.49857(5) E/N (S.S) · variational
Vieijra & Nys (2021)
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
VMC, p = 0 Lanczos steps
-0.49656(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
VMC + 1 Lanczos step
-0.49855(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
VMC + 2 Lanczos steps
-0.49886(1) E/N (S.S) · variational
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
VMC + Lanczos steps, extrapolated in the variance
-0.49906(1) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Hu et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
DMRG on the L x L torus, 4096 SU(2) states
-0.4975980 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
DMRG on the L x L torus, 6144 SU(2) states
-0.4979610 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
DMRG on the L x L torus, 8192 SU(2) states
-0.4981750 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
DMRG, extrapolated in the truncation error (4096-8192 SU(2) states)
-0.4992(1) E/N (S.S) · extrapolated
Gong et al. (2013)
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
ViT
-0.4981150 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Golubev et al. (2026)
J1-J2 square 8x8, J2 = 0.5
previous work [23] (Nomura & Imada neural-network solver)
-0.4984600 ○ E/N (S.S) · variational
Nomura & Imada (2021), quoted in Golubev et al. (2026)
J1-J2 triangular, 108 sites, J2 = 0.125
GCNN + Lanczos step
-0.51268(9) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Roth et al. (2022)
J1-J2 triangular, 108 sites, J2 = 0.125
GCNN (deep group-equivariant CNN)
-0.51175(7) E/N (S.S) · variational
Roth et al. (2022)
J1-J2 triangular 12x12, J2 = 0.125
GCNN + Lanczos step
-0.51218(9) E/N (S.S) · variationalrecord
Roth et al. (2022)
J1-J2 triangular 12x12, J2 = 0.125
GCNN (deep group-equivariant CNN)
-0.51101(6) E/N (S.S) · variational
Roth et al. (2022)
Transverse-field Ising chain, 10 sites, open, h = 1
DMRG (bond dimension = 13)
-1.2381490 E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising chain, 10 sites, open, h = 1
Jastrow baseline
-1.23784(2) E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising chain, 10 sites, open, h = 1
VQE HV (d = 24)
-1.2381338 † E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising chain, 10 sites, open, h = 1
VQE R-CX (d = 10)
-1.2380038 † E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising chain, 10 sites, h = 1
DMRG (bond dimension = 28)
-1.2784906 E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising chain, 10 sites, h = 1
Jastrow baseline
-1.27725(3) E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising chain, 32 sites, h = 0.5
Symmetric FFN, Relu, 32 features per translation
-1.0635431(6) E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising chain, 32 sites, h = 0.5
DMRG (bond dimension = 24)
-1.0635444 E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising chain, 32 sites, h = 0.5
Jastrow baseline
-1.06305(1) E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising chain, 32 sites, h = 1
Symmetric FFN, Relu, 32 features per translation
-1.2737502(2) E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising chain, 32 sites, h = 1
RBM (alpha = 1)
-1.273676(4) E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising chain, 32 sites, h = 1
DMRG (bond dimension = 71)
-1.2737510 E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising chain, 32 sites, h = 1
Jastrow baseline
-1.27191(2) E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising square 6x6, h = 3
DMRG (bond dimension = 1024)
-3.2009084 E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising square 6x6, h = 3
RBM (alpha = 1)
-3.200879(8) E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Transverse-field Ising square 6x6, h = 3
Jastrow baseline
-3.19986(2) E/N (Pauli) · variational
run script, no paper cited
Spinless t-V chain, 32 sites, V = 1, n = 0.5
DMRG (maxbonddim = 200)
-0.4983390 ○ E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Spinless t-V chain, 32 sites, V = 1, n = 0.5
DMRG (maxbonddim = 573)
-0.4983390 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Spinless t-V chain, 32 sites, V = 2, n = 0.5
DMRG (maxbonddim = 200)
-0.3852719 ○ E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Spinless t-V chain, 32 sites, V = 4, n = 0.5
DMRG (maxbonddim = 200)
-0.2344426 ○ E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 0.01, n = 0.3125
VMC Determinant Slater-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz
-0.7487521(6) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 0.01, n = 0.3125
VMC Determinant Slater-Backflow-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.74875162(7) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 0.01, n = 0.3125
HF
-0.7487500 ○ E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 0.1, n = 0.3125
VMC Determinant Slater-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz
-0.737662(2) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 0.1, n = 0.3125
VMC Determinant Slater-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.7376629(3) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 0.1, n = 0.3125
VMC Determinant Slater-Backflow-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.7376632(3) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 0.1, n = 0.3125
DMRG (maxbonddim = 72)
-0.7376632 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 0.1, n = 0.3125
HF
-0.7375000 ○ E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 0.1, n = 0.3125
arSJVMC (this work)
-0.73762(4) E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 1, n = 0.3125
VMC Determinant Slater-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz
-0.639964(9) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 1, n = 0.3125
VMC Determinant Slater-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.639998(9) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 1, n = 0.3125
VMC Determinant Slater-Backflow-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.640039(3) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 1, n = 0.3125
DMRG (maxbonddim = 74)
-0.6400407 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 1, n = 0.3125
HF
-0.6250000 ○ E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 1, n = 0.3125
arSJVMC (this work)
-0.63987(6) E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 10, n = 0.3125
VMC Determinant Slater-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz
-0.2362(2) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 10, n = 0.3125
VMC Determinant Slater-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.237(1) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 10, n = 0.3125
VMC Determinant Slater-Backflow-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.251(1) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 10, n = 0.3125
DMRG (maxbonddim = 74)
-0.2532535 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 10, n = 0.3125
HF
-0.2020479 ○ E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
Spinless t-V square 4x4, V = 10, n = 0.3125
arSJVMC (this work)
-0.2456(6) E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 0.01, n ≈ 0.3611
VMC Determinant Slater-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.7759280(1) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 0.01, n ≈ 0.3611
VMC Determinant Slater-Backflow-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.7759279(3) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 0.01, n ≈ 0.3611
Hartree-Fock (mean-field baseline)
-0.7759259 ○ E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 0.01, n ≈ 0.3611
arSJVMC (this work)
-0.77592(1) E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 0.1, n ≈ 0.3611
VMC Determinant Slater-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.759460(1) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 0.1, n ≈ 0.3611
VMC Determinant Slater-Backflow-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.75945956(9) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 0.1, n ≈ 0.3611
DMRG (maxbonddim = 4096)
-0.7594593 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 0.1, n ≈ 0.3611
HF
-0.7592592 ○ E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 1, n ≈ 0.3611
VMC Determinant Slater-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.6116(1) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 1, n ≈ 0.3611
VMC Determinant Slater-Backflow-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.613193(7) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 1, n ≈ 0.3611
DMRG (maxbonddim = 4096)
-0.6132263 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 1, n ≈ 0.3611
Hartree-Fock (mean-field baseline)
-0.5925926 ○ E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 1, n ≈ 0.3611
arSJVMC (this work)
-0.6069(3) E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 10, n ≈ 0.3611
VMC Determinant Slater-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.171(2) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 10, n ≈ 0.3611
VMC Determinant Slater-Backflow-Jastrow (RBM) Ansatz with K=0 projections (symmetric wrt...
-0.2102(2) E/site · variational
Romero et al. (2024)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 10, n ≈ 0.3611
DMRG (maxbonddim = 4096)
-0.2201239 E/site · variational
run script, no paper cited
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 10, n ≈ 0.3611
HF
-0.1919060 ○ E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
Spinless t-V square 6x6, V = 10, n ≈ 0.3611
arSJVMC (this work)
-0.2008(8) E/site · variational
Humeniuk et al. (2022)
114 of 341 instances carry a result published in 2025 or 2026; the rest
stand where the VarBench compilation left
them on 2024-10-22. Every instance page says which of the two it is, because a website that says
nothing about its own currency reads as more authoritative than it is.
Every row is one published claim about one Hamiltonian instance: the energy, its error bar, the
method, the primary reference, and a declared bound_type saying what the number
actually is — a strict variational bound, a projected or fixed-node estimate, a zero-variance
extrapolation, or a numerically exact result. An exact result is the record wherever one exists;
on every other instance only strict variational bounds compete for it, which is what keeps an
extrapolated number from beating a measured one.
The rules are in RULES.md, the row format in DATA.md.