Where each number below was read, and how it was checked.
-4.52589(9), AFQMC
Checked 2026-10-15 · published PDF Science 386, 296 (2024), sources/journal/science386-296.pdf, sha256 80f8b792, and Supplementary Materials, sources/journal/science386-296-sm.pdf, sha256 4539b5df (node fetch: Cloudflare 403; fetched in the automation browser after the article page loaded); arXiv:2302.04919v2 compared; the number itself from the VarBench dataset v1.1.0 = ref. [63] of the paper (Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.13377360, the GitHub release of tag v1.1.0, commit 0064b70; the Zenodo API timed out from this host, so the tag in varbench-history was read)
Reported as. -289.657 | 0.006 (total energy, units of t)
8 x 8, half filling, U = -8. Science SM S3 E 1-2 (journal version, same text as arXiv v2 Suppl. S3 E): 'For sign-problem-free systems, e.g., the repulsive Hubbard model (U > 0) at half-filling or the spin-balanced attractive Hubbard model (U < 0) [135, 147], numerically exact results are given by AFQMC using a generalized Metropolis algorithm with force bias [30, 148]'; 'For all systems computed in this work, we have either extrapolated Delta tau to zero or set it to a fixed value (typically Delta tau = 0.01) and verified that the Trotter error is well within our statistical error.' Hamiltonian (S5) H = -t sum c+c + U sum n_up n_dn, no shift, t = 1, N_up = N_dn. Neither the Science main text nor the SM prints any of these energies (searched both PDFs for the stored digits); the dataset is the printing source. Exact (stochastic) with sigma = AFQMC error bar; peer-reviewed venue. Not a duplicate (HFPS -289.653376 is Chen et al.'s own).
-4.525834, VMC (HFPS)
Checked 2026-09-15 · source text of arXiv:2507.10705 read locally (arXiv HTML or pypdf layout text); value copied from the harvested cell and the text, no LLM transcription of numbers; single reading
Reported as. -4.525834
TABLE III, row U=-8, column 'E/N_site', sigma^2/N_site=2.3e-5 | Slightly above exact_per_site -4.525890625, consistent with a variational bound.