QMBLthe quantum many-body leaderboard

All instances / Heisenberg

Heisenberg triangular 6x6

Exact energy and best values (rules §6)

exact -0.5603734 ED
Wu et al. (2024) · the instance is solved
best variational -0.560313(3) VMC (GCNN)
Roth et al. (2022) · the lowest unflagged variational energy, a strict variational bound

Energies as E/N (S.S). Classes are different claims and are not ranked against each other.

The Hamiltonian

H = ∑⟨ij⟩ σi·σj

Nearest-neighbour Heisenberg antiferromagnet, J = 1, written with Pauli matrices.

lattice
triangular
sites
36
boundary
periodic
energies
22

Stored as a total energy; quoted here as E/N (S.S), which is what the papers report (how the conversion works).

Every published energy

Grouped by what the number is. The exact energy comes first where there is one; in every other group the lowest unflagged energy is its best value, and each row's distance is to that best (rules §6).

Numerically exact (1)

Exact diagonalization, an exact solution, or sign-problem-free QMC where that is established. An exact energy is shown first, before the best of each other class. QMC is exact only within its error bar, which it must state, and reads exact (stochastic); an exact diagonalization outranks it. For a diagonalization resolved by symmetry sector only the ground state's sector is listed; the lowest energies of the other sectors are the instance's spectrum, in its JSON, and are not shown as the exact energy.

E/N (S.S)distance to class bestσVar(E)V-score methodsourcecodeyearcomment
-0.5603734exact 0 n/a n/a n/a ED
VarBench reference run
Wu et al. (2024) run script 2024

Strict variational upper bounds (21)

Energies that a variational state reached (VMC, DMRG and MPS at finite bond dimension, PEPS, NQS, VQE). Each is an upper bound on the ground-state energy.

E/N (S.S)distance to class bestσVar(E)V-score methodsourcecodeyearcomment
-0.560313best variational 0 3.0e-6 n/a n/a VMC (GCNN)
peer reviewed
Roth et al. (2022) uses NetKet 2022
-0.5601tied with best variational at 2σ 2.1e-4 4.0e-4 n/a n/a VMC (LCN)
peer reviewed
Fu et al. (2022) 2022
-0.55922 1.1e-3 n/a n/a n/a VMC (GCNN)
preprint
Roth & MacDonald (2021) 2021
-0.559214 1.1e-3 6.0e-6 n/a n/a VMC (aCNN)
peer reviewed
Wang et al. (2023) rqHe1/aCNN 2023
-0.55874 1.6e-3 4.4e-5 5.45e+0 3.0e-2 VMC (GCNN)
QMBL run
QMBL cost-to-reproduce run, checks/cost/ rerun (QMBL code) 2026
-0.5581022 2.2e-3 n/a 7.07e+0 3.9e-2 DMRG
VarBench reference run
Wu et al. (2024) run script 2024
-0.5580076 2.3e-3 n/a n/a n/a DMRG
QMBL run
QMBL cost-to-reproduce run, checks/cost/ rerun (QMBL code) 2026
-0.5562 4.1e-3 2.0e-4 7.73e+0 4.3e-2 VMC (2D RNN)
peer reviewed
Moss et al. (2025) mschuylermoss/HeisenbergRNN 2025
-0.55549 4.8e-3 4.7e-5 5.85e+0 3.3e-2 VMC (ViT)
QMBL run
QMBL cost-to-reproduce run, checks/cost/ rerun (QMBL code) 2026
-0.55519 5.1e-3 4.0e-5 n/a n/a VMC (PP)
quoted from another paper peer reviewed
Kaneko et al. (2014), quoted in Iqbal et al. (2016) 2014
-0.5550453 5.3e-3 n/a n/a n/a DMRG
QMBL run
QMBL cost-to-reproduce run, checks/cost/ rerun (QMBL code) 2026
-0.55420 6.1e-3 5.0e-5 n/a n/a VMC (EPS)
peer reviewed
Mezzacapo & Cirac (2010) 2010
-0.553 n/a n/a n/a n/a VMC (Neural Gutzwiller)
quote-not-in-primary quoted from another paper preprint
Ferrari et al. (2019) 2019
-0.55148 8.8e-3 5.0e-5 n/a n/a VMC (Gutzwiller)
quoted from another paper peer reviewed
Heidarian et al. (2009) 2009
-0.5500876 1.0e-2 n/a n/a n/a DMRG
QMBL run
QMBL cost-to-reproduce run, checks/cost/ rerun (QMBL code) 2026
-0.548025 1.2e-2 3.0e-6 n/a n/a VMC (Gutzwiller)
peer reviewed
Iqbal et al. (2016) 2016
-0.543 1.7e-2 1.0e-3 n/a n/a VMC (Gutzwiller)
peer reviewed
Weber et al. (2006) 2006
-0.5320 2.8e-2 1.2e-4 3.57e+1 2.2e-1 VMC (RBM)
QMBL run
QMBL cost-to-reproduce run, checks/cost/ rerun (QMBL code) 2026
-0.5100 5.0e-2 1.7e-4 8.03e+1 5.4e-1 VMC (RBM)
QMBL run
QMBL cost-to-reproduce run, checks/cost/ rerun (QMBL code) 2026
-0.49161 6.9e-2 4.5e-5 4.35e+1 3.1e-1 VMC (RBM)
VarBench reference run
Wu et al. (2024) run script 2024
-0.48678 7.4e-2 4.2e-5 3.70e+1 2.7e-1 VMC (Jastrow)
VarBench reference run
Wu et al. (2024) run script 2024

Flagged rows

A flagged row stays listed in rank order but cannot be the best of its class. Rules §10 says how a flag is lifted or upheld.

quote-not-in-primary, VMC (Neural Gutzwiller), -0.553

Finding. Quote check in the citing paper passed: Roth & MacDonald, arXiv:2104.05085v3 Table I, prints 'NN + Gutzwiller [12] -0.553 N/A' (-0.553 x 144 = -79.632, the stored energy), with [12] = F. Ferrari, F. Becca and J. Carrasquilla, Neural Gutzwiller-projected variational wave functions, Phys. Rev. B 100, 125131 (2019), arXiv:1906.00463. In the cited paper as read (arXiv:1906.00463v2, layout and plain text searched for 0.55 and 0.56) I could not locate an energy per site for the 6 x 6 triangular lattice: Sec. V.C gives only the relative error ('from Delta E ~ 2.2% to Delta E ~ 1.4%') and Fig. 9 plots Delta E against N_alpha. -0.553 is a three-digit conversion of that relative error against the exact -0.5603734: -0.5603734 x (1 - 0.014) = -0.552528, and Delta E in [1.35%, 1.45%] gives -0.552808 to -0.552248. The row carries a precision nobody printed and no error bar: the case of the Shallow CNN row on J1J2/square_100_P_0.5 and of the Jastrow-Gutzwiller row on Heisenberg/triangular_900_P, flagged rather than removed (ruling E9, 2026-10-02). Resolution: Roth & MacDonald or Ferrari et al. to say where -0.553 is printed, or removal under RULES.md 8. It holds no record.

How these numbers were read

Where each number below was read, and how it was checked.

-0.5603734, ED

Checked 2026-09-29 · prior recomputation: E2 ed_sym.py, output qmbl-runs/qmbl-verify/out/E2-exact-remote/results/sym36/Heisenberg__triangular_36_P__J2_1__k0-0__c6v-irrep0__z+.json (evidence cited by the plan: qmbl-verify/out/E2-exact-remote (verified))

Reported as. -80.69376896124292 (true residual ||Hx-Ex||/||x|| = 1.75e-10); S^z=0, Gamma, C6v A1, spin inversion +1

Real recomputation (code and output file). |E - stored| = 3.27e-13 (relative 4.05e-15). Second determination: the stored value is the source's own ED (VarBench), a different code. Also read by VB3-varbench-code-heisenberg#78 (scope config: vendor/varbench/Heisenberg/triangular_36_P.md (snapshot 390a21e), row 'Exact diagonalization'; linked scripts/Heisenberg/triangular_36_P/ed_lattice_symmetries.sh).

-0.560313(3), VMC (GCNN)

Checked 2026-09-14 · found in the citing paper's comparison table, then confirmed in the primary source's own PDF (pypdf); no LLM transcription

Reported as. -0.560313 (+/- 0.000003) per site in S.S units

Read from Table 5 of arXiv:2505.20406 (TLAHM, L=6 triangular lattice, PBC, E/N in S.S units), parsed from the arXiv HTML. Row "Group Convolutional Neural Network [32]" = arXiv:2211.07749. Sits 6.0e-5 ABOVE the exact -0.5603734 already on this instance, as a variational bound must. CONFIRMED IN PRIMARY SOURCE - arXiv:2211.07749, results table: "J2/J1 N GCNN ... Exact/Interpolated ... 0 36 -0.560313(3) - -0.5603734" - the GCNN energy at J2/J1 = 0, N = 36, printed beside the exact value.

-0.5601(4), VMC (LCN)

Checked 2026-09-14 · found in the citing paper's comparison table, then confirmed in the primary source's own PDF (pypdf); no LLM transcription

Reported as. -0.5601 (+/- 0.0004) per site in S.S units

Read from Table 5 of arXiv:2505.20406 (TLAHM, L=6 triangular lattice, PBC, E/N in S.S units), parsed from the arXiv HTML. Row "Lattice Convolutional Network [49]" = arXiv:2206.07370. CONFIRMED IN PRIMARY SOURCE - arXiv:2206.07370v1, Table 1: "Triangular 36 0 - -0.55889 -0.5601(4) -0.5603734" - the LCN energy at J2 = 0 on the 36-site triangular lattice, with the regular kernel (Table 3 prints -0.5601(4) for the regular and -0.5501(6) for the special kernel).

-0.55922, VMC (GCNN)

Checked 2026-09-14 · found in the citing paper's comparison table, then confirmed in the primary source's own PDF (pypdf); no LLM transcription

Reported as. -0.55922 per site in S.S units

Read from Table 5 of arXiv:2505.20406 (TLAHM, L=6 triangular lattice, PBC, E/N in S.S units), parsed from the arXiv HTML. Row "Group Convolutional Neural Network [104]" = arXiv:2104.05085. No error bar is given in the table. CONFIRMED IN PRIMARY SOURCE - arXiv:2104.05085, results table: "J2 = 0 ... ED [28] -0.5603734 ... G-CNN -0.55922".

-0.559214(6), VMC (aCNN)

Checked 2026-09-17 · source text of arXiv:2308.09664 read locally (arXiv HTML or pypdf layout text); value copied from the harvested cell and the text, no LLM transcription of numbers; single reading

Reported as. -0.559214(6)

Table 4 of arXiv:2308.09664 (arXiv HTML, sources/2308.09664.html): row "aCNN", column HMTL (Heisenberg model on the 36-site triangular lattice), energy per site; caption: "The aCNN is optimized with the exact sign structure from ED". ED -0.560374 in the same table agrees with the carried exact row -0.5603734 within the last printed digit. | ED value in the same column agrees with Heisenberg/triangular_36_P's exact row within 1e-6 (S.S per site).

-0.55874(4), VMC (GCNN)

Checked 2026-09-24 · checks/cost/run_nqs.py (NetKet 3.22.4, jax 0.8.3) on 1 x NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe, protocol checks/cost/README.md

Reported as. energy -80.45855704311515 sigma 0.006354516711348047 energy_variance 5.45144124948146 tau_corr 0 r_hat 1.0037788694987775 | wall_hms 00:28:22 (wall_seconds 1701.7986515802331) on 1 x NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe, Slurm job 15097829 | parameters 7232, steps 2000 x n_samples 4096, eval samples 131072

Final evaluation, the training chains carried on: 131072 samples, 1024 chains, 64 discarded per chain; tau_corr 0.00, R_hat 1.004. Trained 2000 steps of SR (QGTJacobianDense, conjugate gradients, 300 iterations max, diag_shift 1e-06, diag_scale 0.01), lr 0.01 after a 200-step linear warmup, 4096 samples per step, MetropolisExchange, d_max 2, seed 20260921. Divergence rule applied: energy -1.04e+8 at step 153, outside the Hamiltonian's bound, parameters restored from step 150 (E = -73.15), learning rate 0.005 from there. Per-step trace and final parameters beside the results file.

-0.5581022, DMRG

Checked 2026-09-29 · VarBench snapshot 390a21e (vendor/varbench) and full upstream history (varbench-history, git log --follow on the file, every version); varbench/methods ed31bb0 run script and program read as text; no output log or result file exists in the methods repo for any Heisenberg row

Reported as. | -80.36672248793934 | | 7.068731007373572 | 36 | 0 | DMRG (bond dimension = 2048) | [code](https://github.com/varbench/methods/blob/main/scripts/Heisenberg/triangular_36_P/dmrg.sh) |

dmrg.sh: heisenberg_2d.jl --peri --L 6 --J2 1 --zero_mag --max_B 2048: 6x6 triangular torus, Pauli, J = 1, Sz = 0, 50 sweeps at D = 2048. 0.327 above the exact energy (0.4%): a torus in a snake MPS; QMBL's own chi = 2000 DMRG cost run on this instance gives -80.35309, consistent. Entered 721e09e (2022-08-22), never changed; linked 2024-07-19.

-0.5580076, DMRG

Checked 2026-09-24 · checks/cost/run_dmrg.py (TeNPy 1.1.1) on 8 cores, protocol checks/cost/README.md

Reported as. chi_max 2000 chi_reached 2000 energy -80.35309162427853 (energy_SS -20.088272906069633) sweeps 16 max_trunc_err 0.00023684509156278683 | wall_hms 03:03:20 (wall_seconds 10999.921602776274) on 8 cores, Slurm job 15056281 | cpu_core_hours 24.44427022839172

two-site DMRG, TeNPy, finite MPS on the torus with long-range couplings, Sz conserved, Neel product start, mixer on, a new engine per rung on the previous rung's state; MPO bond dimension 41; stopping rule max_sweeps 15, max_E_err 0.000001 (TeNPy also requires |Delta S| < 1e-5 by default and stops only once the sweep count exceeds max_sweeps); this rung ran 16 sweeps, the cap. Energy computed in S.S units and stored x4 (Pauli, the instance's convention).

-0.5562(2), VMC (2D RNN)

Checked 2026-09-14 · arXiv HTML parsed locally from a benchmark comparison table, no LLM transcription

Reported as. -0.5562 (+/- 0.0002) per site in S.S units

Read from Table 5 of arXiv:2505.20406 (TLAHM, L=6 triangular lattice, PBC, E/N in S.S units), parsed from the arXiv HTML. The citing paper's own result.

-0.55549(5), VMC (ViT)

Checked 2026-09-24 · checks/cost/run_nqs.py (NetKet 3.22.4, jax 0.8.3) on 1 x NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe, protocol checks/cost/README.md

Reported as. energy -79.9911596136248 sigma 0.006754502141950846 energy_variance 5.852950728342892 tau_corr 0.010848061807489207 r_hat 1.0042366987297604 | wall_hms 02:40:42 (wall_seconds 9641.68374238303) on 1 x NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe, Slurm job 15056279 | parameters 154800, steps 2000 x n_samples 4096, eval samples 131072

Final evaluation, the training chains carried on: 131072 samples, 1024 chains, 64 discarded per chain; tau_corr 0.01, R_hat 1.004. Trained 2000 steps of SR (QGTJacobianDense, conjugate gradients, 300 iterations max, diag_shift 1e-06, diag_scale 0.01), lr 0.01 after a 200-step linear warmup, 4096 samples per step, MetropolisExchange, d_max 2, seed 20260921. Per-step trace and final parameters beside the results file.

-0.55519(4), VMC (PP)

Checked 2026-09-15 · source text of arXiv:2104.05085 read locally (arXiv HTML or pypdf layout text); value copied from the harvested cell and the text, no LLM transcription of numbers; single reading

Reported as. -0.55519

Table I, J2=0 column, row 'VMC [30]': -0.55519. | Same table as ED row.

-0.5550453, DMRG

Checked 2026-09-24 · checks/cost/run_dmrg.py (TeNPy 1.1.1) on 8 cores, protocol checks/cost/README.md

Reported as. chi_max 1000 chi_reached 1000 energy -79.92652217664256 (energy_SS -19.98163054416064) sweeps 16 max_trunc_err 0.00037311592377740595 | wall_hms 01:10:45 (wall_seconds 4244.665265383199) on 8 cores, Slurm job 15056281 | cpu_core_hours 9.43258947862933

two-site DMRG, TeNPy, finite MPS on the torus with long-range couplings, Sz conserved, Neel product start, mixer on, a new engine per rung on the previous rung's state; MPO bond dimension 41; stopping rule max_sweeps 15, max_E_err 0.000001 (TeNPy also requires |Delta S| < 1e-5 by default and stops only once the sweep count exceeds max_sweeps); this rung ran 16 sweeps, the cap. Energy computed in S.S units and stored x4 (Pauli, the instance's convention).

-0.55420(5), VMC (EPS)

Checked 2026-09-15 · source text of arXiv:2104.05085 read locally (arXiv HTML or pypdf layout text); value copied from the harvested cell and the text, no LLM transcription of numbers; single reading

Reported as. -0.55420

Table I, J2=0 column, row 'VMC [31]': -0.55420 (harvested cell rounded this to -0.5542; full value read directly from source text). | Same table as ED row.

-0.553, VMC (Neural Gutzwiller)

Checked 2026-09-15 · source text of arXiv:2104.05085 read locally (arXiv HTML or pypdf layout text); value copied from the harvested cell and the text, no LLM transcription of numbers; single reading

Reported as. -0.553

Table I, J2=0 column, row 'NN + Gutzwiller [12]': -0.553, N/A error. Not present as a separate row in the harvested cells (its value appears merged into another row's garbled col_header text); read directly from the source table. | Same table as ED row.

-0.55148(5), VMC (Gutzwiller)

Checked 2026-09-15 · source text of arXiv:2505.20406 read locally (arXiv HTML or pypdf layout text); value copied from the harvested cell and the text, no LLM transcription of numbers; single reading

Reported as. -0.55148(5)

TABLE V | same as above

-0.5500876, DMRG

Checked 2026-09-24 · checks/cost/run_dmrg.py (TeNPy 1.1.1) on 8 cores, protocol checks/cost/README.md

Reported as. chi_max 500 chi_reached 500 energy -79.2126086267484 (energy_SS -19.8031521566871) sweeps 16 max_trunc_err 0.0006064990325569687 | wall_hms 00:27:35 (wall_seconds 1654.652795038186) on 8 cores, Slurm job 15056281 | cpu_core_hours 3.6770062111959687

two-site DMRG, TeNPy, finite MPS on the torus with long-range couplings, Sz conserved, Neel product start, mixer on, a new engine per rung on the previous rung's state; MPO bond dimension 41; stopping rule max_sweeps 15, max_E_err 0.000001 (TeNPy also requires |Delta S| < 1e-5 by default and stops only once the sweep count exceeds max_sweeps); this rung ran 16 sweeps, the cap. Energy computed in S.S units and stored x4 (Pauli, the instance's convention).

-0.548025(3), VMC (Gutzwiller)

Checked 2026-09-15 · source text of arXiv:2104.05085 read locally (arXiv HTML or pypdf layout text); value copied from the harvested cell and the text, no LLM transcription of numbers; single reading

Reported as. -0.548025

Table I, J2=0 column, row 'VMC [27]': -0.548025. | Same table as ED row.

-0.543(1), VMC (Gutzwiller)

Checked 2026-09-15 · source text of arXiv:2505.20406 read locally (arXiv HTML or pypdf layout text); value copied from the harvested cell and the text, no LLM transcription of numbers; single reading

Reported as. -0.543(1)

TABLE V. Estimates of the ground-state energy per spin for the TLAHM on an L=6 lattice with PBC. | per-site convention fixed by exact-diagonalization and record rows in the same table

-0.5320(1), VMC (RBM)

Checked 2026-09-24 · checks/cost/run_nqs.py (NetKet 3.22.4, jax 0.8.3) on 1 x NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe, protocol checks/cost/README.md

Reported as. energy -76.60531652120582 sigma 0.016821273919707346 energy_variance 35.74488444047138 tau_corr 0.018780686130572932 r_hat 1.0040647022141393 | wall_hms 00:06:08 (wall_seconds 368.4269102141261) on 1 x NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe, Slurm job 15056266 | parameters 1368, steps 2000 x n_samples 4096, eval samples 131072

Final evaluation, the training chains carried on: 131072 samples, 1024 chains, 64 discarded per chain; tau_corr 0.02, R_hat 1.004. Trained 2000 steps of SR (QGTJacobianDense, Cholesky on the dense S, diag_shift 1e-06, diag_scale 0.01), lr 0.01 after a 200-step linear warmup, 4096 samples per step, MetropolisExchange, d_max 2, seed 20260921. Per-step trace and final parameters beside the results file.

-0.5100(2), VMC (RBM)

Checked 2026-09-24 · checks/cost/run_nqs.py (NetKet 3.22.4, jax 0.8.3) on 1 x NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe, protocol checks/cost/README.md

Reported as. energy -73.44638853443263 sigma 0.02482466794726441 energy_variance 80.29017754419445 tau_corr 0.0030190221099478665 r_hat 1.0041322644078527 | wall_hms 00:07:07 (wall_seconds 427.04232935328037) on 1 x NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe, Slurm job 15056270 | parameters 149, steps 2000 x n_samples 4096, eval samples 131072

Final evaluation, the training chains carried on: 131072 samples, 1024 chains, 64 discarded per chain; tau_corr 0.00, R_hat 1.004. Trained 2000 steps of SR (QGTJacobianDense, Cholesky on the dense S, diag_shift 1e-06, diag_scale 0.01), lr 0.01 after a 200-step linear warmup, 4096 samples per step, MetropolisExchange, d_max 2, seed 20260921. Per-step trace and final parameters beside the results file.

-0.49161(5), VMC (RBM)

Checked 2026-09-29 · VarBench snapshot 390a21e (vendor/varbench) and full upstream history (varbench-history, git log --follow on the file, every version); varbench/methods ed31bb0 run script and program read as text; no output log or result file exists in the methods repo for any Heisenberg row

Reported as. | -70.7915 | 0.0065 | 43.4753 | 36 | 0 | RBM (alpha = 1) | [code](https://github.com/varbench/methods/blob/main/scripts/Heisenberg/triangular_36_P/vmc_rbm.sh) |

scripts/Heisenberg/triangular_36_P/vmc_rbm.sh: 'python3 vmc.py --ham heis_tri --boundary peri --sign mars --ham_dim 2 --L 6 --zero_mag --net rbm --seed 123 --show_progress' -> 6x6 triangular lattice (ColoredJ1J2 back_diag=False: square grid + (i,j)-(i+1,j+1) diagonals), periodic; NetKet Heisenberg J = 1 in Pauli form with Marshall rotation on the square bonds only (sign_rule=[True, False], a unitary: the diagonals join same-sublattice sites); Sz = 0 (total_sz=0, MetropolisExchange); real float32 RBM, alpha = 1 (nk.models.RBM, log_cosh); 10^4 SR steps; final estimate over 2^20 samples (vmc.py lines 268-269). sigma/sqrt(Var/2^20) = 1.009: the stored sigma is the error of that final estimate. 9.9023 above the exact -80.6937689612426. M2/M6 flags (if any): real float32 parameters make the amplitudes positive, so on this frustrated lattice the ansatz cannot carry the ground-state signs; no constant shift is involved and the energy is a valid bound. History: entered 721e09e (2022-08-22, Dian Wu) as -70.7915 | 0.0065 | 43.4753 | RBM (alpha = 1); linked 5047bfd (2024-07-30). Program files postdate the value (scripts added to varbench/methods 2024-07-30); they document the settings after the run.

-0.48678(4), VMC (Jastrow)

Checked 2026-09-29 · VarBench snapshot 390a21e (vendor/varbench) and full upstream history (varbench-history, git log --follow on the file, every version); varbench/methods ed31bb0 run script and program read as text; no output log or result file exists in the methods repo for any Heisenberg row

Reported as. | -70.0967 | 0.0060 | 37.0349 | 36 | 0 | Jastrow baseline | [code](https://github.com/varbench/methods/blob/main/scripts/Heisenberg/triangular_36_P/vmc_jastrow.sh) |

scripts/Heisenberg/triangular_36_P/vmc_jastrow.sh: 'python3 vmc.py --ham heis_tri --boundary peri --sign mars --ham_dim 2 --L 6 --zero_mag --net jas --seed 123 --show_progress' -> 6x6 triangular lattice (ColoredJ1J2 back_diag=False: square grid + (i,j)-(i+1,j+1) diagonals), periodic; NetKet Heisenberg J = 1 in Pauli form with Marshall rotation on the square bonds only (sign_rule=[True, False], a unitary: the diagonals join same-sublattice sites); Sz = 0 (total_sz=0, MetropolisExchange); real float32 Jastrow (nk.models.Jastrow); 10^4 SR steps; final estimate over 2^20 samples (vmc.py lines 268-269). sigma/sqrt(Var/2^20) = 1.010: the stored sigma is the error of that final estimate. 10.5971 above the exact -80.6937689612426. M2/M6 flags (if any): real float32 parameters make the amplitudes positive, so on this frustrated lattice the ansatz cannot carry the ground-state signs; no constant shift is involved and the energy is a valid bound. History: entered af1d48f (2022-09-01, Dian Wu) as -70.0967 | 0.0060 | 37.0349 | Jastrow baseline; linked fdb4bfb (2024-07-30). Program files postdate the value (scripts added to varbench/methods 2024-07-30); they document the settings after the run.

Coverage

Newest published number here: 2025. Literature last checked 2026-09-15 (table harvest of cached arXiv sources (match_tables.mjs --all), every matched paper read for this instance): 7 papers read, 3 of them with an energy on this page.

This instance as data

JSON · source file on GitHub · add a result · open an issue about this instance